Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼öÁ¾ÀÇ »ó¾ÆÁú»öµµÀçÀÇ »öÂ÷ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

COLORIMETRIC ANALYSIS OF COLOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DENTIN PORCELAINS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 37±Ç 4È£ p.425 ~ 432
±èâ¼·, ÀÓÀå¼·, ÀüÀ¯Áø, ÀüÀ±°æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èâ¼· ( Kim Chang-Seop ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÓÀå¼· ( Lim Jang-Seop ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀüÀ¯Áø ( Jeon You-Jin ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀüÀ±°æ ( Jeon Yun-Kyung ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to evaluate the color differences that can exist between differnet brands of dentin porcelain having identical shade designations. The instrumental colorimetric technique was used to determine these differences. The three brands of dentin porcelain used were Vita VMK-68, Shofu Vintage, and Ceramco II. The three shades selected were the Vita Lumin shades A2, B2, and C2. The color difference values were compared with each other using L*, a*, b*, three variables of the CIELAB color system, and E. The results of this study were as follows: 1. Corresponding shades of different brands of dentin porcelain produced different L*, a*, b* values. 2. The greatest E value in corresponding shade was found to exist between Ceramco II and Shofu Vintage, followed by between Vita VMK-68 and Ceramco II, and then between Vita VMK-68 and Shofu Vintage. 3. The E values in shade C2 were mainly influenced by L* value ; however none of L*, a*, b* values had greater influence on E values than the others in shade A2, B2. 4. Shofu Vintage had the highest b* value, followed by Vita VMK-68, and then Ceramco II.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed